As technology plays an ever more pervasive role in our lives, the prevalence of social media and its impact on human interaction has become a favourite topic for dramatists. This is especially the case for younger generations who are living through the explosion in apps and devices that demand more and more of their attention. How is this wiring our brains differently? How is it affecting relationships and communities and, significantly, the individual who may be better connected but as a result more isolated?
Writer/director Damon Lockwood has taken these concerns and extrapolated them out to the year 2020 where social media is the dominant form of interaction. All other institutions and social norms have decayed, most notably the status of the humble post office, the most anachronistic of services in a fully digital world.
Lockwood pushes the premise to absurd extremes as the main generator of the comedy in this near future world. Young people's heads are forever buried in their mobile devices. Eye contact is shunned as almost unnatural. Older technologies, if recognised, have taken on an aura of archaeological artefacts – the landline, the fax machine, the pre-smartphone mobile, and books. There are even workshops that encourage people to try and interact in person. They are largely unsuccessful. Mating rituals are conducted via apps and online platforms. Shopping is largely automated.
Amongst the eyes down, thumbs blazing digital morass is a beacon of the pre-digital age, now hopelessly redundant, the postman himself, played by, curiously for a student production, Curtin lecturer Philip Miolin. Regarded as a pervert (due to his predilection for actual human contact) by our gaggle of social media mad youngsters he lives on the fringes until the world faces an horrendous cataclysm too heinous to contemplate…
The online world is switched OFF in a massive failure of servers.
Much screaming ensues. In fact, in the close quarters of the Studio space at the Blue Room, a deafening amount of screaming. How can one live in a world without the internet; without social media; without the ability to cyber-stalk potential partners? Quelle horreur!
The postman is summoned by a Mad Max obsessed Postal executive who puts the General in Postmaster General, Ben Strong played with scene chewing relish by Taylor Beilby. It seems the world’s last letter is in his possession and must be delivered to a man whose life may be in danger across a now dystopian landscape of bereft youngsters.
So anachronistic is the concept of a letter even the production staff forgot that such a vessel requires a stamp (not to mention a story beat that requires a youngster to drop what looked like a $10 note, surely an abstraction for that age group now let alone in 2020) … but I digress. What follows next is a bizarre series of encounters that seem more like individual skits than a coherent narrative through line. Granted, it is a difficult task to give a cast of fifteen actors sufficient stage time but some of the characters are marginal at best. There was one long monologue from a character that came from nowhere, raved on about some implausible scenario then vanished in a burst of B-grade villainous laughter never to be seen again.
It seems the Postman is such a good chap that he can’t but help people who, coincidentally, come across his path. There is a lot of convenient plotting that felt more lazy than inspired in the general wackiness of what was going on. Ultimately the Postman reaches his destination where there is a surprise reveal which is problematic as Miolin’s age versus that of a presumptive love interest is significant.
The humour is very broad and mostly slapstick with a lot of one-note reactions to the modern versus old technologies. I found it sporadically funny with some inventive delivery of props and a crazy showdown between the Postman and his natural enemy, the pet dog.
The actors who fared best for me were Lauren Beeton as Heather who was allowed a more naturalistic reign as one of the online lovers; Beilby who delivered a full-on assault as Ben Strong; Joanna Tu who was amusingly officious as the Workshop Leader, and later as a somewhat confused Kiwi cartographer; and Bianca Roose proved a quiet presence playing a character not held in thrall by technology. Samuel Ireland had his moments as the other half of the lovers though he lapsed into the preponderance of shouting that befell a lot of characters. It certainly is not a subtle comedy. Maddy Mullins played audience favourite Workshop Girl though this was more through sympathy as the character’s earnest attempts at inclusion are constantly rebuffed.
Designer Rhiannon Walker has eschewed the usual darker tones of the Blue Room providing an all-white set including panels on which images are occasionally projected. These establish locations, for example the library or the post office though I was surprised they weren’t used for the ‘travelling montage’.
While this style of comedy wasn’t my cup of pixels, many in the audience, especially of contemporary age to the performers, seemed to be having a good time with it all.
Showing posts with label Curtin University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Curtin University. Show all posts
Saturday, 9 December 2017
The Perilous Adventures of the Postman - Hayman Theatre Company (9 December 2017)
Wednesday, 2 March 2016
Love and Information - Hayman Theatre Company (1 March 2016)
I was talking to Director Teresa Izzard after the play and
she gave me an insight into the particular challenges in presenting celebrated
playwright Caryl Churchill’s script. No character names; a cavalcade of
vignettes with no settings, no stage directions, no through line; and a rough
structure of seven headings where individual scenes could be slotted into any
order. It sounded like a Theatre Makers Do-It-Yourself Kit. Here’s a box of
pieces with no instructions for assembly, now go make something.
This, of course, gives the director, actors, and the design
team a great deal of freedom in how to present and interpret this mass of
information. It also makes things a little problematic from an audience
perspective. You quickly come to realise that there isn’t going to be any kind
of traditional narrative. I could sit here and try and draw thematic threads
out of it all and certainly there are touchstones such as fidelity, memory, childhood
and the like. But really, for me, this was like a collection of audition scenes
or, perhaps more aptly, a Showcase on Speed.
Once I realised this I settled into enjoying the production
for what it was instead of trying to analyse it to determine what it might have
been. The Showcase analogy seems most appropriate and certainly this was an
excellent introduction into the performance and technical capabilities of this
year’s Curtin University students. Izzard keeps things rattling along as scenes
follow each other in rapid succession or even overlap briefly as the actors
rotate through scenarios and personas with alacrity.
For the first time that I have seen, the black box space of
the Hayman Theatre Upstairs was transformed with a built in set – white flats
on three sides with three doors that were used with dizzying frequency. There
were also white blocks that increased in number throughout the performance
until there were fully a dozen on stage. The actors added to and changed their configuration
to provide the basic setting of whatever situation they found themselves in.
This was enhanced by use of projected images and the title of the scene. Those
titles most often than not were a single word. The lighting and sound design
added the final layer with the impressive use of lasers at one point and
everything from pumping dance music to static as transitions took place.
This all created a vibrant space for the actors to work in
and they used it to maximum effect. Those eight actors are Lauren Beeton,
Declan Brown, Eloise Carter, Chelsea Gibson, Anna Lindstedt, Holly Mason,
Nelson Mondlane, and Jess Nyanda Moyle. It was a very good ensemble with each
actor having to inhabit a range of vastly different characters and make them
believable in very short time spans. I also appreciated the physicality
involved as different combinations of actors clambered over each other and
those blocks or were dancing, at times full tilt. One of the standout scenes
simply called Wife involved Moyle and
Brown in a ballet like sequence of intense emotion and intimacy that utilised
all of the stage to stunning effect.
That, however, is where the success or otherwise of the play
as a collection of fractured parts rests. Scenes work better than others
to highlight the talents on display. Some are no more than brief
interludes that whizz by before the next vignette begins. Like any audition
piece it’s the selection of the material that goes a long way to determining
the outcome. Every actor has a chance to shine and it’s very much an equal
opportunity piece from that regard.
From an audience viewpoint it probably ended at about the
right time as I was beginning to weary of the conceit. There was no connective
tissue and no one thread or character I could hang my hat on. As a true
showcase of acting and technical ability, however, it certainly set the scene nicely for
what should be another strong season for Curtin’s Hayman Theatre Company.
Love and Information is being performed at the Hayman Theatre Upstairs on
the Curtin University campus until Saturday 5th March.
Thursday, 8 October 2015
80 Minutes No Interval - Hayman Theatre Company (7 October 2015)
This review has been written by a meticulously constructed algorithm that was inserted into a small, innocuous looking black box. That box was gathered together with other small, black boxes and placed in a front row seat with an excellent view of the stage. The previous owner of this blog, an intermittent writer and more than occasional theatre reviewer, is now trapped in an existential flower store listening to the music of Kylie Minogue and Natalie Imbruglia whilst pondering the significance of the Mamet play Oleanna and the ideal garnish for an evening meal.
Yes, there are several levels of absurdity in writer Travis Cotton's play - a comedy about a failed novelist turned theatre reviewer who simply wants to marry Claire but is thwarted by a professional waiter, his own calamitous culinary curiosity, and the existence of the future of criticism, the aforementioned black box. It does not end well for our hero, Louis, who goes to jail for murder only to contemplate an ill-conceived dalliance in more ways than one on his release.
There is no doubt the play is funny and there are several weird and wonderful characters along the way with plenty of jabs at theatre cliches and a healthy dose of self-awareness. Yet when all is said and done I wasn't quite sure what it all signified after the laughter faded. There are constant references to David Mamet's Oleanna and I was looking for thematic connections that simply didn't appear to be there.
Ultimately the play feels more like the film Adaptation where Donald Kaufman's screenplay takes pre-eminence in the last third skewering the absurdity of the type of Hollywood film Charlie Kaufman would rail against. Yet, apart from a funny button that ends the play, I kept waiting for the grander point or idea. It never came. The mocking of cliches seemed to be the point and that felt a little hollow.
The lead character Louis, played with straight man charm by Kane Parker, bounces from one increasingly absurd situation to the next but to no great end. The opening scene where the Gallic accented waiter (Jeremy Bunny) pleads with him not to propose to Claire (Lauren Beeton) is amusing enough and sets Louis on his way. He wants to prove he can support Claire and finally get one of his manuscripts published. Some of the failed writer turned theatre reviewer observations were nicely acerbic and had me squirming!
The publisher, played with malevolent glee by Tristan McInnes, demands Louis sign on the dotted line but all ends in mock tragedy and our hero is carted off to the big house for twenty years. The jail dance sequence set to Minogue's Can't Get You Out Of My Head is a sight to see - itself seemingly a gag about "interpretive dance".
The final scene at the florist's has its own machinations, again mocking some well worn story devices that litter both film and theatre. It is well set up and paid off but again, not devastating enough a note for mine to end the play on.
Before the show started, Eleanor Davidson was playing the flute, stage right - an eclectic mix that included Summertime and Fly Me To The Moon. That she enters the action as Louis' boss is one of the devices Claire mentions in a long rant about theatre cliches. The introduction of the black box that replaces Louis spins us off into strange territory indeed but that was only the beginning of the weirdness.
Bunny has all kinds of fun as the waiter with an outrageous accent who constantly challenges Louis. Beeton plays Claire with a no nonsense practicality that would scare the hello out of any writer and Caitlin McFeat makes for an earnest florist as Mathilde.
It's the first time I've seen a revolve used at the Hayman Upstairs and there was a touch of Noises Off as we see actors cum stagehands rotate the set with a wink and nod at the audience.
It is entertaining and you will certainly laugh but it felt like it needed another layer to really elevate the material to more than a series of loosely connected, funny scenes.
Written by Travis Cotton, Directed by Philip Miolin and starring Kane Parker, Jeremy Bunny, Lauren Beeton, Eleanor Davidson, Kayla MacGillivray, Alex Gerrans, Tristan McInnes, Kharla Fannon, Ashleigh Ryan and Caitlin McFeat, 80 Minutes No Interval is exactly that and is on at the Hayman Theatre Upstairs until 10 October.
Yes, there are several levels of absurdity in writer Travis Cotton's play - a comedy about a failed novelist turned theatre reviewer who simply wants to marry Claire but is thwarted by a professional waiter, his own calamitous culinary curiosity, and the existence of the future of criticism, the aforementioned black box. It does not end well for our hero, Louis, who goes to jail for murder only to contemplate an ill-conceived dalliance in more ways than one on his release.
There is no doubt the play is funny and there are several weird and wonderful characters along the way with plenty of jabs at theatre cliches and a healthy dose of self-awareness. Yet when all is said and done I wasn't quite sure what it all signified after the laughter faded. There are constant references to David Mamet's Oleanna and I was looking for thematic connections that simply didn't appear to be there.
Ultimately the play feels more like the film Adaptation where Donald Kaufman's screenplay takes pre-eminence in the last third skewering the absurdity of the type of Hollywood film Charlie Kaufman would rail against. Yet, apart from a funny button that ends the play, I kept waiting for the grander point or idea. It never came. The mocking of cliches seemed to be the point and that felt a little hollow.
The lead character Louis, played with straight man charm by Kane Parker, bounces from one increasingly absurd situation to the next but to no great end. The opening scene where the Gallic accented waiter (Jeremy Bunny) pleads with him not to propose to Claire (Lauren Beeton) is amusing enough and sets Louis on his way. He wants to prove he can support Claire and finally get one of his manuscripts published. Some of the failed writer turned theatre reviewer observations were nicely acerbic and had me squirming!
The publisher, played with malevolent glee by Tristan McInnes, demands Louis sign on the dotted line but all ends in mock tragedy and our hero is carted off to the big house for twenty years. The jail dance sequence set to Minogue's Can't Get You Out Of My Head is a sight to see - itself seemingly a gag about "interpretive dance".
The final scene at the florist's has its own machinations, again mocking some well worn story devices that litter both film and theatre. It is well set up and paid off but again, not devastating enough a note for mine to end the play on.
Before the show started, Eleanor Davidson was playing the flute, stage right - an eclectic mix that included Summertime and Fly Me To The Moon. That she enters the action as Louis' boss is one of the devices Claire mentions in a long rant about theatre cliches. The introduction of the black box that replaces Louis spins us off into strange territory indeed but that was only the beginning of the weirdness.
Bunny has all kinds of fun as the waiter with an outrageous accent who constantly challenges Louis. Beeton plays Claire with a no nonsense practicality that would scare the hello out of any writer and Caitlin McFeat makes for an earnest florist as Mathilde.
It's the first time I've seen a revolve used at the Hayman Upstairs and there was a touch of Noises Off as we see actors cum stagehands rotate the set with a wink and nod at the audience.
It is entertaining and you will certainly laugh but it felt like it needed another layer to really elevate the material to more than a series of loosely connected, funny scenes.
Written by Travis Cotton, Directed by Philip Miolin and starring Kane Parker, Jeremy Bunny, Lauren Beeton, Eleanor Davidson, Kayla MacGillivray, Alex Gerrans, Tristan McInnes, Kharla Fannon, Ashleigh Ryan and Caitlin McFeat, 80 Minutes No Interval is exactly that and is on at the Hayman Theatre Upstairs until 10 October.
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
Melancholy Play: A Contemporary Farce - Hayman Theatre Company (21 April 2015)
There is a word – a Polish word I believe – that means the
sadness one feels as the echo of laughter slowly fades from a recently emptied
theatre. If only I could remember what
that word is…
If I could then that’s how I would describe the aftermath of
watching this very funny play that was wonderfully performed and staged. That
and my now sudden guilty feelings about eating almonds!
Yes, this is a gloriously off-the-wall farce that spirals
off into strange territory indeed as one of its characters turns into… an
almond.
But let’s backtrack a little and start with Sarah Ruhl’s
deliciously subversive script. Here it is melancholy and sadness - as embodied
by Tilly (Zoe Street) - that is sexy and irresistible with happiness being a
chaotic force that causes all kinds of disaster. Flipping the expected
stereotypes around is a masterstroke that allows for the farcical and absurd
but retains a key message with the almond transformation a clear metaphor. The
last third of the play flirts with going way over-the-top but is grounded by an
almost too obvious passage of dialogue delivered by Tilly that urges the
characters to genuinely be there and support the nut afflicted Frances (Olivia
Dugandzic)… even if they have to become nuts themselves. Yes, how does one
truly support a friend or loved one who is enmeshed in sadness and melancholy?
Street is excellent as the bank employee Tilly. Her world
weary, languid and poetic turn in the early going that marks her sadness as
being so potent is terrific to watch. In turn, her therapist Lorenzo (Kane
Parker); a tailor (Nathan Whitebrook); a hairdresser Frances (Dugandzic) and then
Frances’ lover, the nurse Joan (Daisy Grant) all are drawn to and ultimately
fall in love with her. Buoyed by such emotion that is magnified on her
birthday, Tilly suddenly becomes inextricably happy causing everyone else to
slip into sadness as her allure is somehow diminished. Here Street switches
gears to become almost annoyingly ecstatic, playing children’s games and even
riding a bike onstage at one point. It’s an eye-catching performance.
Whitebrook is the tentative tailor who kicks off proceedings
by offering a defence of melancholy directly to the audience which is a
technique used throughout as characters speak through hanging window frames.
They also represent the portals to vistas that inspire melancholy such as
wistfully gazing through a window on a rainy afternoon. His character’s descent
into tear-filled and hiccupped sadness is nicely observed as is the boisterous
rivalry with Lorenzo. Parker sports a very good Italian accent as the lovelorn
therapist and he gives an exuberant performance that is amusingly capped off by
his plaintive pleas to know if he too now is an almond. The fight scene with
Whitebrook is a highlight.
Dugandzic gives Frances that air of infatuation despite
herself and the fact the character is already in a relationship. It is as if
she is compelled to be with Tilly. I especially liked her ‘delivery’ as an
‘almond’ perched alongside the audience in her ‘letterbox’. Her ‘resurrection’
is masterfully staged. There is a late revelation regarding a dubious backstory
that was perhaps one step too far for me but is well acted nevertheless. Daisy
Grant’s nurse is seemingly far more practical so it’s a treat to see her play
the ‘gaga’ looks and clinginess as Joan falls for Tilly’s charms as well.
The cast is rounded out by Savannah Wood, resplendent and
elegant in a gown as she plays the cello to stage left. Wood played beautifully
and added so much texture and tone to key moments. Of course, the cello is
perhaps the instrument most suited to melancholy so it was cheeky and fun when
Lorenzo asks her to play something ‘happy’ after the other characters suddenly
realise she is there. This is another example of playing around with
conventions with Tilly even handing her red balloon to the young boy sitting
next to me.
The play fairly rockets along at just under 80 minutes and is well directed by Leah
Mercer with seamless scene transitions and handoffs between characters. There
is great energy throughout and, as I’ve come to expect with the Hayman Upstairs
Theatre, good use of multiple entry and exit points for the actors. This is the
second show I’ve seen there this year and it appears they have really taken
their set designs up a notch with this and Spring Awakening. The wallpaper on
the back wall; the varied rugs on the stage; the hanging frames; the centrepiece
couch; Frances and Joan’s apartment space – all well-appointed and adroitly
used.
Above all this is very funny even as the farce turns
into something quite surreal in its last third. The performances are excellent,
especially in the first half as Tilly weaves her spell. This is a really
enjoyable production with only four more performances, 22-25 April at Curtin
University’s Hayman Theatre Upstairs.
Written by Sarah Ruhl, Directed by Leah
Mercer, Melancholy stars Olivia Dugandzic, Daisy Grant, Kane Parker, Zoe
Street, Nathan Whitebrook, and Savannah Wood.
Wednesday, 4 March 2015
Spring Awakening - Hayman Theatre Company (3 March 2015)
I remarked to one of the actors that I needed to “think
about the play” as we were talking after the show. She replied along the lines
of, “you always say that about the shows I’m in.” That may indeed be true but
is testament to the sort of interesting material I've seen performed by Curtin University's Hayman Theatre Company in the last year or so.
I found Spring Awakening, a play I was not familiar with
(and distinct from the much later musical adaptation), to be quite challenging.
Its language is as dense as its thematic complexity and I had not expected the
two and a half hour running time (plus intermission). It demanded a lot of its
audience and certainly did of its actors. For a student production it is an
audacious choice and there is much to admire about the result. However, some
actors fared better than others with the incredibly difficult dialogue that at
times was alliteration happy and a little florid to my modern ears. It also
felt overwritten and could have used some judicious editing but perhaps that is
more to do with present day attention spans more than a century on from its
original conception. Having said all that, a great deal of thought and skill has
gone into its staging.
The story itself, in essence, centres around two 14 year
olds – Wendla (Beth Tremlett) and Moritz (Alexander Gerrans) - who are totally
unprepared for their sexual awakening; and the impact a more self-aware
Melchior (Sean Guastavino) has on both of their lives resulting in his own
demise. Rape, abortion, suicide, depression, and the recriminations and
judgment of the “powers-that-be”, whether parents, teachers, or the church,
marked this as controversial in its day. It still packs a wallop even now and
there is an undercurrent of very black humour throughout.
I must admit it began to coalesce into something far more
cohesive for me in the second half when the ramifications of the ‘sins’ in the
first two acts are ‘judged’. In many ways, as I remarked to the director
afterwards, A Clockwork Orange reminded
me of it in that regard. That Melchior is ‘put on trial’, rightly for his
treatment of Wendla and unfairly for ‘educating’ Moritz, and his defiance in
the face of withering condemnation is compelling. The play takes a surreal turn
at the end when he is confronted by two figures in a graveyard having escaped
the reformatory he was banished to by his parents. The identity of one of these
is not in doubt; the other defiantly mysterious. It is left to the audience to
decide what Melchior’s fate will ultimately be.
This is perhaps the best looking production I have seen at
the Hayman Theatre Upstairs. It is beautifully lit with a clear distinction in
lighting choices between the two halves as the realism of the first two acts
gives way to the symbolism of the third. The stage is well presented with a
ramp that the actors could clamber on, under, and through; a divan; and
multitudes of paper strips depicting the winter forest very effectively. Actors
also perched themselves along the side walls of the theatre to great effect. There
was the appropriate use of ominous or evocative music as the scene demanded.
The costuming was excellent and I particularly liked the
work of the ensemble to re-enact key events in the back stories of the
principals or add texture and context. They were mostly clad in old fashioned
white cotton attire that was evocative and a representation of ‘purity’.
To the performances and Tremlett inhabits Wendla with great
spirit but her character is undone by a dangerous naivety fostered
by her Mother (Kayla MacGillivray). The importance of knowledge, especially in
regard to sexuality is a major thematic component. That Wendla is denied this
knowledge makes her vulnerable and Tremlett plays this confusion well. That the
ultimate arc is one of tragedy, the transformation from high-spirited innocent to
being physically and emotionally crippled is well rendered. Guastavino plays
Melchior with a calm resoluteness and sweet smile that belies the terrible acts
his character commits especially against Wendla, the worst of which is
harrowing and drew an audible exclamation from an audience member behind me.
Gerrans battled gainfully with some truly difficult blocks of dialogue but admirably
retained his composure though he was the least confident of the three with the
language. His reappearance in the third act, however, was well done as it
echoed the story Moritz had told (and discounted) earlier.
The support was very good with Jeremy Bunny impressive as
Hansy; Gemma Middleton revelling in a long monologue as Ilse; Amelia Tuttleby
particularly forceful as Melchior’s mother; and Savannah Wood playing varying
roles as she brought what otherwise would have been straight verbal
descriptions to vivid, at times, wailing life. Nathan Whitebrook gives a
charismatic cameo at the end.
The acts of violence are well-handled and, as mentioned,
director Teresa Izzard utilises the ensemble to give this real movement and
energy as well as allowing all the actors to maximise the potential of the
performance space. It is at times a difficult watch but a rewarding one as it
prompts discussion and further thought which is always to be embraced.
Spring Awakening is directed by Teresa Izzard with a
translation of the original German script (Frank Wedekind) by Jonathan Franzen,
and stars Jeremy Bunny, Jarryd Dobson, Alexander Gerrans, Sean Guastavino,
Kayla MacGillivray, Gemma Middleton, Aaron Smith, Terence Smith, Beth Tremlett,
Amelia Tuttleby, Nathan Whitebrook and Savannah Wood. The show is at the Hayman
Theatre Upstairs and runs until Saturday 7 March.
Wednesday, 10 December 2014
Teeth 2 Tail - Curtin's Performance Studies & Hayman Theatre Company (9 December 2014)
A story is told in the early going of this play written by
Steve McCall that is delivered with such frenetic energy and charm that I was
so caught up in the sheer entertainment of it all that I nearly missed that it
was the key thematic blueprint for everything that was about to unfold. It was
unusual insomuch as it served as an introduction to the character Harry played
by Kane Parker and you normally wouldn’t expect such thematic heft in an
opening salvo. Very nicely written and performed, Messrs’ McCall and Parker.
That story was a tale about the goings on at a watering hole
in Kruger National Park where a herd of buffalo are surprised by a pride of
lions and even a crocodile while tourists look on shocked. Remarkably, even
though a ‘baby’ buffalo is snatched in all the chaos by a croc, the herd
regroup and fight back…
In many ways the set is its own ‘watering hole’ where a
series of characters in a strictly observed hierarchy interact and clash. Two
sides fronting the audience are chain link fencing topped with barb wire;
another side is the wall of the theatre with a platform where characters lurk
and observe atop and under; the final side having the exits that are disguised
by an arch like construction. It is wonderfully enclosed and cramped with holes
in the fencing allowing characters, on occasion, to literally prowl right in
front of the audience. The small performance space contains a couple of school
desks, a drum, and a fridge built into a section of the arch, and adds
enormously to the tone of the piece. It’s tight and grimy and you’re sitting up
close and personal to the action. The actors, eleven in all, manoeuvre expertly
through the set.
This story has its own animals both predatory and meek, set
in a high school where Eva (Eloise Carter) is fascinated by her now
deceased grandfather’s war service at Kokoda and her older brother Clint’s (Ryan
Hunt) current participation in the armed forces overseas. She also wants to
serve her country but is bullied by fellow students Cate (Gemma Middleton) and
Sophie (Zoe Street) for being studious and, well, smart. Eva’s older sister
Matilda (Violette Ayad) is pregnant to
resident drug dealer and punk ‘Turk’ (Sean Guastavino) while their mother Trish
(Ashleigh Morris) likes her wine and the company of, allegedly, a series of
men.
Added to this combustible mix is the school teacher Ms
Carlton (Amelia Tuttleby) who tries to help Eva but is largely ineffectual in
the face of particularly Cate’s defiance; the tough minded and sexually
adventurous Paige (Holly Dodd); the sweet newcomer Lucy (Amy Johnston) who
attempts to befriend Eva; and finally the naïve Harry (Parker) who will become
an unwitting accomplice as Eva ‘regroups and fights back’ with tragic
consequences.
In many ways this reminded me of the play Punk Rock but with
a totally recognisable Australian voice. Yes, things escalate out of control
and Eva proves to be an increasingly fierce adversary as she stands up to those
who wrong her. Eloise Carter gives a tremendous performance as she moves from
passive nerd to a far more calculating and ruthless presence. I almost passed
straight by her after the show not recognising who she was and Carter admitted,
tellingly, that she looked far less ‘psychotic’.
There are inserts throughout the play where Eva seemingly
re-enacts with the cast events from her grandfather’s time at war with the
Japanese. These seemed to me though, to be signposts of a sense of, perhaps not
delusion, but certainly a lack of understanding of what war truly is. A point
hammered home when her brother Clint returns from overseas and tells her a
story about what warfare in places in Afghanistan is really like. That he is
suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome is a lovely juxtaposition to his
sister’s state of mind as they both deal with the ramifications of her actions.
Excellent performances abound and there is a richness to each
character in both how they are drawn and presented. Guastavino is a wonderfully
physical and menacing presence as Turk and his callous treatment of Eva’s
sister is in many ways the catalyst for the escalation in events that spiral
out of control. Parker’s Harry is thoroughly sympathetic as he is drawn into
something out of his ability to comprehend. Middleton proves to be a fiery
antagonist but even her Cate is ranked below Dodd’s Paige who is perhaps the
“alpha female” to Turk’s alpha male. Dodd ratchets up the wattage as she
confronts Eva head on over Turk.
Johnston’s turn as Lucy adds an element of
genuine warmth and sweetness and her later scenes with Carter are particularly
well handled. I also really liked Morris’ performance as the almost absent
mother who really has no idea of what her youngest daughter is capable of.
Hunt’s involvement as the brother whose return will make everything right is telling
and he gives a sober rendering of a man with competing duties to family and
country. Guilt is also rife throughout and how different characters deal with
this is critical.
This is a thought provoking and thematically dense play with
excellent writing and wonderful performances by all the cast. Mark Storen’s
direction within the deliberately cribbed space is very good as characters
rotate into their scenes then return to what felt at times to be silent
observers in the background, like watchful eyes around a watering hole as the
animals slowly tear each other apart...
Teeth 2 Tail has three more shows on at The Blue Room,
finishing on Saturday 13 December and is highly recommended.
Monday, 27 October 2014
Crave - Hayman Theatre Company (26 October 2014)
Four actors, four wooden chairs, one black box theatre. Two
actors in white, the other pair in black. Male, female, black, white. Nameless,
elusive, damaged. Short, precise lines picked up and carried by each actor as
if thoughts tumbling in the breeze. Terrible words, terrible deeds, terrible
legacy. Abrupt outbursts, anger, longing, obsession. Moments of eloquence,
dense passages of intense monologue. Hurt. Futility. Abuse. Rape. Murder?
Confusion, annoyance, concentration. It’s Sunday night and
I’m struggling. The fractured nature of the delivery and of the stylised writing
forces me to pay attention. It is elliptical and obtuse. Initially it surprises
me. Then it annoys me. Then slowly, awkwardly, its rhythms and darkness
fascinate me. What is it all about? What does it mean? Why do I care? How
should I respond? I feel emotionally distant as if watching an ugly transgression
through Perspex. Is it even real?
Ultimately, did I like Sarah Kane’s writing? No. It was
deliberately ambiguous, a verbal manifestation of that blurred object that
refuses to fall into focus in the extreme of your peripheral vision. Far too
much like hard work on a Sunday night. On any night.
What elevates the production is the fine work of all four actors
who are very good with the exacting dialogue that requires precise timing;
and the direction of Savannah Wood who keeps them in motion and interacting in
striking pairings. Those actors are white-clad Caleb Robinson-Cook who gives a bravura
extended monologue that was an emotional assault of rapid fire words that I
later learnt took the better part of 12 weeks to nail in rehearsal. I can
believe it. His black-clad male counterpart is Ryan Hunt who predominantly
interacts with Annika-Jane Shugrue, also in black, while Emma Smith gravitates
more to Robinson-Cook.
All of them exhibit a range of emotions as they verbally
joust over the most horrible of topics. This is full on and not for the
fainthearted. A couple of choice
blood-curdling screams act as both punctuation points and a sonic slap in the
face to make sure the audience’s attention doesn’t waver. The chairs are used
as props throughout and there is a real physical nature to the performance that
adds to the verbal conundrums. This is essential as a static presentation would
have lost me in the more portentous meanderings of the writing.
At the end I could not help but admire the skill and
precision that was used to bring a very difficult piece to life.
But what did it all mean?
My immediate reaction was that the black and white
characters were different representations of a man and woman who were in a
dysfunctional relationship with an exploration of the reasons for that
dysfunction and its consequences. There were lines about generations passing on
events and knowledge so I initially thought each embodied a family history of
sorts. Talking to one of the actors afterwards he suggested they had tackled it
as four separate characters, one pairing being the parents of the troubled
couple. I had taken references to 'mother' as being more metaphorical but that’s
the elusive nature of the play. Any interpretation might be valid with the
non-specific stage directions in the script and the lack of clarity of who is
talking to whom.
So I looked online for previous reviews from different
productions and pretty much none of them offered a theory other than to list
themes, general observations and exhibit a fascination with T.S. Eliot. At least I wasn’t
the only one who found it hard work!
I can’t say I 'enjoyed' the play but it certainly was a
fascinating if dark experience that was well performed and directed.
Crave was written by Sarah Kane, Directed by Savannah Wood and starred Caleb Robinson-Cook, Ryan Hunt, Emma Smith and Annika-Jane Shugrue.
Crave was written by Sarah Kane, Directed by Savannah Wood and starred Caleb Robinson-Cook, Ryan Hunt, Emma Smith and Annika-Jane Shugrue.
Monday, 15 September 2014
Sunday Night Theatre - Hayman Theatre Company (14 September 2014)
One of the pleasant discoveries of my theatre going year has been the regular staging of a tandem of one act plays at the Hayman Theatre Upstairs on the Curtin University campus. This gives the students an opportunity to produce a mix of theatre from well-known plays like one of tonight’s offerings to self-devised pieces to, occasionally, originally written work. The students also rotate directing, acting, and off-stage duties to give them a full appreciation of every department.
This Sunday’s programme definitely had laughs on its mind with the cleverly written comedy of errors, Albert, and the always entertaining The Real Inspector Hound by one of my favourite writers, the great Tom Stoppard.
This Sunday’s programme definitely had laughs on its mind with the cleverly written comedy of errors, Albert, and the always entertaining The Real Inspector Hound by one of my favourite writers, the great Tom Stoppard.
Albert
A Finnish au pair, an Italian soccer fan, and an amorous
Englishman walk onto a stage…The set up for a gag? Sure. But it’s a pretty good
one as this production plays with miscommunication, stereotypes and ‘bloody
foreigners’ to amusing effect.
Karin (Michelle Endersbee) is looking after a baby in an English household where the parents have left for the evening to go to the cinema… or bicycle riding depending on your language of choice. She is interrupted by Nico (Jeremy Bunny) who is there to visit his sister, the mother of said newborn. They in turn are interrupted by Albert (Caleb Robinson-Cook), eager to declare his love for the previous au pair who has only recently left. None of them speak or understand each other’s language so miscomprehension escalates amusingly as identities and agendas are hilariously misconstrued.
Karin (Michelle Endersbee) is looking after a baby in an English household where the parents have left for the evening to go to the cinema… or bicycle riding depending on your language of choice. She is interrupted by Nico (Jeremy Bunny) who is there to visit his sister, the mother of said newborn. They in turn are interrupted by Albert (Caleb Robinson-Cook), eager to declare his love for the previous au pair who has only recently left. None of them speak or understand each other’s language so miscomprehension escalates amusingly as identities and agendas are hilariously misconstrued.
Endersbee plays it straight as the new nanny increasingly
bewildered by events. Her Finnish accent never strays into caricature and she
grounds proceedings with an air of Scandinavian innocence. Bunny is very good
as the charismatic Italian who becomes increasingly frustrated with his
inability to communicate with the other two… and the perplexing issue of the
lavatory which (he thinks) he’s been told is the well-worn armchair. Yes, it’s
that kind of humour. Robinson-Cook gives a knee-slapping, earnest portrayal
which spirals out of control as he eventually comes to believe he is the father
of the baby.
Directed by Ariel Tresham and Written by Richard Harris,
this had good timing and was very amusing. It was a perfect companion piece for
Hound which also features misunderstandings and mistaken identities galore…
The Real Inspector
Hound
Nobody panic but theatre critics are murdered in this
production. I mean, in the play, not in the audience… though…
No, let’s not entertain that thoug—would someone answer that
damn phone?!
The stage is set in an
upstairs theatre cut off from the ground floor by a winding staircase
surrounded by, um, marshes and, oh yes, a cliff. The chances of front of house
staff arriving in time to thwart a madman are slim to none. I eyeball my fellow
audience members cautiously.
Of course, Stoppard is having enormous fun taking the piss
out of Agatha Christie style murder mysteries with their contrived,
inaccessible settings and abundance of exposition. The great conceit is that
two theatre critics are commenting in the wings and eventually get drawn into
the drama on stage as the dead body (played with commendable stillness by
Charlie Darlington) is finally revealed to be…
The first of those two critics is Birdboot (Monty Sallur)
who fancies himself a ladies man and maker of (female) stars. His fellow critic
is second stringer Moon sitting in for head critic Higgs who is indisposed for
the night. In a slight departure from the norm, Moon here is played by a woman,
Felicity Meath. On stage, in the rooms of Muldoon Manor, newcomer Simon
Gascoyne (Kane Parker) arrives causing much consternation for the lady of the
house, the widow Cynthia Muldoon (Emily Matthews), her guests Felicity
Cunningham (Ashleigh Morris) and Major Magnus Muldoon (Tristan McInnes), and
the ever present maid, Mrs Drudge (Annika-Jane).
The radio announces that a madman has escaped and Inspector Hound (Jack Middleton) soon arrives to assist. Birdboot and Moon will ultimately take centre stage as the whole thing folds in on itself with devilish glee. Who indeed is the real Inspector Hound? Who is the killer? Who is the dead body? Why are fiends murdering theatre critics? We actually are nice people… no, really!
The radio announces that a madman has escaped and Inspector Hound (Jack Middleton) soon arrives to assist. Birdboot and Moon will ultimately take centre stage as the whole thing folds in on itself with devilish glee. Who indeed is the real Inspector Hound? Who is the killer? Who is the dead body? Why are fiends murdering theatre critics? We actually are nice people… no, really!
The cast tackled this with a real exuberance that mostly
works though sometimes chunks of trademark witty Stoppard dialogue were
delivered at breakneck speed. A breath and a touch more measured pace would
have been better suited to let the words weave their magic. They are all solid
with Middleton a quirky Hound, McInnes a cartoonish Major, and Matthews a
glamorous Lady Muldoon. It’s Meath and Sallur though who get to play the
showpiece roles and they do well with the only reservation being the overly
rapid dialogue at times. It’s a fun production and always entertaining to
witness the reaction of newcomers to the play as the absurd yet clever
revelations mount.
Directed by George Ashforth and Written by Tom Stoppard, The
Real Inspector Hound received enthusiastic applause and ended a fun night out
at Curtin.
Sunday, 17 August 2014
Bremen Coffee - Hayman Theatre Company (17 August 2014)
The power of good theatre - indeed any good storytelling -
is to transport us to a different time and place often to explore themes that
at first may seem foreign but resonate in some way with a modern audience. That
is certainly the case with this play which plunges us into a misogynistic world
set in 1960s American suburbia where woman appear to only exist to serve and
please men. The opening scene is a shocking and brutal reinforcement of this.
It had me squirming with discomfort. That the hero of the story is a woman who
craves freedom – of thought and deed – in this male dominated world is to be
applauded. That she does so by murdering everyone who belittles and humiliates
her by serving them poisoned coffee is subversive, confronting, and
occasionally a source of deeply black comedy.
That woman is Gish played superbly by Beth Tremlett in an
eye-catching performance. The range she displays is impressive and the arc from
meek housewife to conniving murderess to a confident woman at the height of her
powers at the end of the play (albeit with a wreckage of dead characters behind
her) is outstanding.
The play opens on a domestic scene between husband and wife.
I apologise as I was unfamiliar with most of the other actors and there was no
programme to assist with who was playing what character. Let me say though, the
young actor playing Gish’s first husband, John, had the unenviable task of
being, let’s face it, a complete bastard. He does this well… very well in fact
which was the source of my discomfort. Not only does he belittle and manhandle Gish,
he forces her to perform a sexual act that is well staged (suggested not seen)
but shocking in its perfunctory nature. This is after two of his friends,
Michael and Zimmerman (who will come to feature in Gish’s life) have stopped by
for a drink as men do.
Gish responds by serving John the poisoned coffee which
leads to his painful demise. The subtlety Tremlett shows here with the barest
hint of a smile as she watches her husband struggle is terrific.
The one male constant in Gish’s life is her overbearing
father who immediately makes plans to have a man take over John’s business
because, obviously, as a woman Gish couldn’t possibly do so. This ends up being
Michael who Gish falls madly in love with and who moves in with her. Except her
Mother (by process of elimination I’m thinking played by Eleanor Davidson), a
good Christian woman, harangues her daughter for living in sin. Well, that’s
the end of her as Gish serves up another deadly brew.
Michael, who can’t stand the sound of Gish’s two children at
play - and more crucially the fact that they are John’s - refuses to marry her.
On learning this, in a truly shocking beat, Tremlett’s glance towards the door
behind which the children laugh seals their fate. As she takes the poison to
their room there were audible gasps from the audience. It is a truly awful and
tragic highlight and shows the depths to which the need for a man has permeated
her psyche that Gish would sacrifice her children. That Michael continues to
refuse marriage wanting to keep his options open spells the end for him - another
coffee, another fatality. But not before she calls a priest to marry them just
before he dies. This was an overtly funny scene that gave the audience a chance
to genuinely laugh instead of the nervous “did he really just say that?”
titters of discomfort throughout. The values on display were so utterly
anathema to today’s society, leastways spoken out loud so brazenly.
And so the roster of coffee inspired deaths mount – her
father who still insists she can’t run the business. Zimmerman who becomes
another lover but yet again proves to be the same as any other man in her
world. Gish’s brother newly returned from what appeared to be military service
who wants to wrest control of the business from her, and even her female friend
(Zoe Barham) for, well, gladly accepting her role as a plaything for her own husband.
In the end, Gish sits alone in front of the television, free
at last… but at what cost?
I really liked this though I did have qualms. Every single
man without exception is a bastard. Okay, maybe the priest might prove okay but
don’t drink the coffee Father just in case. The play presents a very particular
viewpoint but with no redeeming features in any of the men it tends to undercut
any potential dilemma for Gish in the eyes of the audience. They all deserve it
so they all get it. Case closed. The staging was very effective with a good set
depicting the suburban household but the use of a pop soundtrack particularly
early tended to dilute the drama. The tone was interesting because the start is
so in your face that it’s only later I started to sense that there was a
sporadic, deeply black, comedic heartbeat.
The performances - with American accents - were good but
this is clearly a showcase for Tremlett’s talents as she’s hardly ever off
stage and proves to be the standout. On the evidence of this performance and at
only 18 she has a very bright future.
Written by Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Directed by Michelle
Endersbee and starring Beth Tremlett, Zoe Barham, Eleanor Davidson, Aaron
Smith, Jamie Turner, Jeremy Bunny and Kane Parker, Bremen Coffee is on next Sunday night, 24 August, at the Hayman Theatre Upstairs at Curtin
University.
Gifts - Hayman Theatre Company (17 August 2014)
It seems that God has been on the mind of university drama
students this week. Hot on the heels of Back to Eden out at Murdoch comes
Gifts, the first production of tonight’s Sunday Night Theatre offering at
Curtin University.
I apologise in advance for the generic mention of performers
as there was no programme with actor names assigned to roles.
However, here God is ‘the beginning’ and portrayed in lively
fashion as a glam rock ‘n’ roll star who has grown bored of his own existence.
What is one to do but to create a new plaything, give it a head, two arms, two
legs, eyes, the power of speech and, in perhaps an error he will come to rue, a
brain. I give you Man.
Man immediately demands freedom (and the ability to dance) quickly
followed by a Wife. God decides that the Wife shall bear Man’s children, a
decision she isn’t exactly wild about but, God being God, he gets his way. A child soon arrives with three more to
follow in quick succession with thumb-sucking intensity. They too will
eventually demand their freedom as unruly teenagers rebelling against their
parents. God introduces happiness to quell the unrest.
What I like about a lot of Curtin productions is that they
contain a range of performance styles – dance, movement and song are integral
parts of this play. There is the use of classic pop tunes – David Bowie’s Life on
Mars as God creates Man, and the play ends with The Beatles’ Golden Slumbers. A
highlight, however, is the live performance of Queen’s We Will Rock You as the
four performers playing (by now) disaffected teenagers harangue the Man and
Wife while a bemused God looks on (and provides the iconic beat).
There is also a lovely use of a simple white sheet with a
slit down the middle where, in order, Man’s, above him Wife’s, then God’s head
only appear as they debate what has been wrought. It was nicely done. The
costume and hairstyle for God would have made Marc Bolan proud.
This was a short, tongue in cheek production that was
amusing and energetic. Directed by Emelia Peet and written by Joanna Hempel, it
starred Kharla Fannon, Tristan McInnes, Chris McIntosh, Keliesha O’Breza, Kane
Parker, Ashleigh Ryan, and Aaron Smith.
Thursday, 7 August 2014
Ruben Guthrie - Hayman Theatre Company (6 August 2014)
What is the true nature of addiction? What is its source?
Genetic? Peer pressure? Lack of willpower? A crutch for doubts and fears? A
feeling of invincibility? All of these things? None of them? Can we truly
overcome addiction or do the answers to the above questions ultimately
determine who we are and what our fate is no matter how valiantly we struggle
against our demons?
This is the dark territory Ruben Guthrie tackles,
specifically alcohol abuse. It doesn’t pull any punches as it
points a white-hot spotlight at the title character and examines his flaws,
warts and all. It would be easy to call this a cautionary tale but this is not
didactic, it doesn’t preach, and there are no easy answers. The play is more
observational and a true character study. In many ways the play is as flawed as
Ruben himself but ultimately it is a powerful piece that will linger, its
closing moments quite haunting.
So who is Ruben Guthrie (wonderfully played by Nathan
Whitebrook)? In a boisterous opening we discover he is a high flying ad
executive who has been lauded for the fourth year in a row for yet another
brilliant commercial. As a result he goes on a legendary bender which ends up
with him diving off a rooftop into a shallow wading pool and breaking his arm.
His model girlfriend, Zoya (Amy Johnston) is none too impressed and returns to
Prague leaving Ruben alone in an apartment decorated by booze. He sets out to
tackle his addiction to the bottle but is challenged every step of the way. Ray (Jarryd Dobson), an executive from Ruben’s advertising agency, alarmed
at his decline in creativity as he goes dry, urges remedial action via Vodka.
Ruben’s father, Peter (George Ashford), an alcoholic himself, is none too
impressed as he admonishes his son; and a friend newly arrived from overseas
with a bagful of duty free alcohol, Damian (Sean Guastavino), isn’t helping matters. Yet Ruben perseveres finding a sponsor in Virginia (Roisin Bevan) who
he eventually becomes engaged to. Things are going well until events - and his
Mum (Eleanor Davidson) - conspire to plummet him back into old habits with
calamitous results.
In many ways this tale reminded me of Denzel Washington’s
alcoholic pilot in the movie Flight. The character is who he is and despite all
his best efforts cannot change that. The fact that Ruben does so well in
resisting all the temptations and judgments put before him in the middle
section of the play makes the last third tragic, heartbreaking and, at times,
difficult to watch. In the best possible way.
Whitebrook is excellent in the title role – charismatic,
boisterous, blokey, needy, at times remorseful, fearful, exuberant, vulnerable
– he plays the part with great energy and physicality. I must admit I think he
did his best work in the quieter moments – the story of his high school friend
and protector Corey, a particular highlight; but also as he wonders out aloud
whether his condition is hereditary; and when he discovers the consequences of
his Dad’s own addiction. Then there is his decision – a brief flicker of faint
hope in the face of tragedy - in the very closing moments where he is beaten
down and dejected that really will linger with you. The sequence where he falls
off the wagon is heartbreaking because, as unlikable as he is at times, we do
care and empathise with his plight.
Johnston convincingly plays the leggy young model who grew tired of his
antics and her character really is the catalyst both for Ruben’s
sobriety and eventual lapse. Dobson adds real humour as the smarmy ad exec
with his love of classic Australian advertising jingles and exhortations to
Ruben’s vanity and pride. Bevan is initially a much grounded foil for Ruben’s
affections but a late character change that nudges her into ‘crazy’ territory,
while well conveyed, seemed more plot mechanics than organic.
Guastavino plays the gay friend with a balance between comic
sensibility and Ruben’s ‘darker angel’ without teetering into caricature. I was
obviously sitting next to friends of his who found the more homo-erotic sections
worthy of tittering like schoolgirls over (it’s called acting, lads) which was
unfortunate however Guastavino and Whitebrook handle those moments well. Davidson has a
tricky role as it’s clearly a much older character but I also found the
mother’s motivations and actions difficult to understand, especially a late
scene where she attempts to cajole her son into drinking. Finally, Ashforth
gives a nice turn as the Dad even though there were times I also questioned his
treatment of Ruben. But maybe that’s the point – perhaps it’s the ones who love us most who are the worst enablers?
Ashforth is also notable because, yes, there was The Ruben
Guthrie Band, a five piece outfit playing in the wings of which he was a
guitarist and singer. The other band members were Eloise Carter, Keith Ong,
Jack Middleton and Jordan Norrish. They sang the aforementioned jingles but
also classic pop and rock songs (Faith, Toy Soldiers, Summer of 69, Eternal Flame) that added vibrancy to
proceedings. The set was awash with neon signs and a whole back wall of alcohol
with a well-worn lounge chair the centrepiece.
Not everything worked for me – the play settled down after
the (perhaps overly?) exuberant opening and it was the Corey tale when Ruben
recalls why he first started drinking that was the actual hook to engage me. The
play felt a little long and with no intermission was a solid two hours. The
mother, as mentioned, was a problematic character especially given the
revelations about the family history. Zoya’s return coincided too clinically
with Virginia’s character turn, itself a little arbitrary, to be anything other
than plot driven. There were also times when the writing felt too clever – some
of the language (“discombobulated”) seemed out of character; there were sly
writer’s gags including Zoya telling Ruben to talk in subtext if he was going
to be a novelist that came from nowhere; and other 'knowing' reactions off (mis)interpretations
of words. All that said though, this is a very strong character study with no
easy outs that will make you squirm and make you think. For that it is to be
applauded.
Written by Brendan Cowell, Directed by Mark Storen and
starring Nathan Whitebrook, Amy Johnston, Roisin Bevan, Sean Guastavino, George
Ashforth, Eleanor Davidson and Jarryd Dobson, featuring The Ruben Guthrie Band
of Eloise Carter, Keith Ong, George Ashforth, Jack Middleton and Jordan
Norrish, the play has three more performances this Thursday, Friday and Saturday
nights, 7pm at the Hayman Theatre Upstairs.
Wednesday, 11 June 2014
A History of Happiness - Hayman Theatre Company (11 June 2014)
Ah yes, that elusive state we all strive for – happiness.
But what does it mean to be truly happy? What has it meant down through the ages?
What does it mean to YOU?
These are some of the questions posed by acting
students from Curtin University in this 90 minute, self-devised production that is comprised of vignettes from moments in history, dance, direct audience
interaction, various narrators, and even a ‘happy counsellor’.
The last of which I became acquainted with after being asked
a question early on in proceedings and led out to the ‘happy room’ downstairs
where I had a nice chat with said counsellor and sampled the assorted creams. (We
agreed that the Monte Carlo is clearly the best choice in this regard. Another
two audience members also had ‘counselling sessions’ though I can’t vouch for
their biscuit preference!)
Back inside and the Neanderthals are giving way to Philosophy
as we start asking questions about the nature of happiness and our place in the
world before Religion arrives to shut down this practice and provide a ‘definitive’
answer (as Joan of Arc discovers in a re-enactment of her fiery demise). The
discovery of Capitalism declares Money to be the new God before Power takes
over and finally Freedom presents us with an overabundance of Choice. These
moments are played with the majority of the company of some 35 actors on stage
and I apologise for not naming the individuals until the end of this review as
I am unfamiliar with most of them. Included in this are some four narrators
deployed at various stages - setting the scene, interacting directly with the
audience and each other, with one even asking questions of the actors.
This is where the piece really shines because within the
overarching construction of the ‘history’ there are recurring scenes -
essentially two-handers - that examine different aspects of happiness and,
interestingly, love.
The standout of these is a couple who are shown, mainly through
dance, falling in love, being in love, falling out of love, then reconciling,
with, if I interpret the last beat of the last scene correctly, impending
parenthood. This was beautifully acted and handled.
Then there’s the anorexic egged on by his subconscious to
exercise and lose weight, ever more weight, otherwise he is a disgrace. This
arc has both dark and light with some nice comic moments by the two actors
including an old-fashioned surprise that I won’t spoil but was a
‘laugh-gasp-out-loud’ moment.
We have two obsessive-compulsives who find each other after
separate dates at the same restaurant go horribly wrong due to their
‘weirdness’. Again, full of humour but also a nicely narrated commentary about
how love is sometimes about when two people find and accept each other’s
weird habits and obsessions.
There is also a virginal, God-fearing woman in white hounded
by a black clad Satan that has an interesting role reversal as the theme of
Power is introduced in the context of relationships and how we handle that.
Lastly, there are six actresses who we see as young children
around the age of 5-6 drawing on the back wall of the stage; then later as teenagers
in what ends up being a quite raunchy sequence with the other cast joining them
on stage doing what teenagers do; then as young mothers, and finally as elderly
women. They are questioned by one of our narrators about what makes them happy,
about their life choices, work choices, regrets, and the like. This personal
history dovetails nicely with the larger history being told. There is a quiet
highlight at the end of this sequence when the ‘surly’ one gives a quite moving
plea to allow yourself to be marked by the dirt of life lest you end up in a
nursing home alone, childless, with no friends.
When A History of Happiness first started it felt a little chaotic
but then all these different threads were slowly deployed and this construction
for a self-devised piece is quite elaborate and thematically impressive. There
is also a great sense of zest in the performances and you can see the time and
care the cast have invested. This is reinforced at the end when one of the
actors simply states that being on stage performing is what makes the cast
happy and it’s a wonderfully genuine and heartfelt statement. The cast sing Pharrell’s smash hit ‘Happy’ (of course) as they dance their
way off stage before the audience is entreated to go out and find their own
happiness.
This is a fun show with great use of humour and movement but it is also
quite perceptive in its interrogation of what happiness is for without showing
the dark how can we truly know the light?
There are three more performances, 12-14 June, upstairs at
the Hayman Theatre and stars the Curtin University Performance Studies Devised Class of 2014: Zoe Barham,
Samantha Barrett, Roisin Bevan, Holly Dodd, Danen Engelenberg, Rachel Foucar,
Amy Johnston, Georgia Knox, Josh Lang, Lachie MacDonald, Kayla MacGillivray,
Jim Maxwell, Gemma Middleton, Ashleigh Morris, Ellie Morrison, Amri Mrisho,
Daniel O'Brien, Monty Sallur, Nicole Sandrini, Polly Seah, Aaron Smith, Emma
Smith, Georgia Smith, Georgia Spencer, Madison Stirling, Zara Suryani, Nattida
Thongin, Amelia Tuttleby, Savannah Wood and Judy Young.
Sunday, 1 June 2014
Acceptable Losses - Curtin University (1 June 2014)
The second play tonight was a scripted piece set in a
dystopian future where the Lord Protector (Carlin Monteiro) aided by the Guard
Captain (Rachel Foucar) keep the peace in an unnamed city using quite brutal
methods. Citizens are rounded up by the Protectorate guards (Jenn Scullion and
Dylan Searle) to be experimented on by Doctor Anders (Alexander Gerrans) for
the mysterious Project 12.
Things go awry when Anders’ child Millie is kidnapped by unknown forces and his wife Fiona (Beth Tremlett) is implicated. She is tortured by the Guard Captain and eventually manipulated to be the scapegoat as ‘the masses’ have grown restless about the disappearances. Rhiannon Petersen plays the ‘Frankenstein’s monster’ of Project 12 as well as the Judge at Fiona’s sham trial.
Things go awry when Anders’ child Millie is kidnapped by unknown forces and his wife Fiona (Beth Tremlett) is implicated. She is tortured by the Guard Captain and eventually manipulated to be the scapegoat as ‘the masses’ have grown restless about the disappearances. Rhiannon Petersen plays the ‘Frankenstein’s monster’ of Project 12 as well as the Judge at Fiona’s sham trial.
Ambitious but uneven, the play sets up a quite atmospheric
world especially with the use of sound effects such as thunder, constant rain,
the slamming of cell doors; a range of costuming from the Lord Protector’s
sleek look in buttoned down vest and wingtip shoes to the uniforms of the
guards; and quite graphic violence, Foucar in particular delighting in putting
a bit of stick about. The tone is mostly grim except for a curious Droog-like
scene by Searle’s guard as he practices pickup lines on Petersen’s inanimate
‘monster’.
Monteiro is all sinister charm as the pre-eminent villain
behind it all but Foucar has the far more boisterous performance as the violent
Guard Captain. Tremlett is clattered about and bound most of the play but gives
a nice performance as the anguished wife concerned for her child. Gerran’s
Anders proclaims himself to be a monster - the ‘silent scalpel of the city’ -
but I was never convinced this was the case as he seemed impotent in the face
of the Protectorate. The play also never addresses who did kidnap Millie so
this felt more plot device than anything as I was waiting for the twist that
never came.
It is, however, a concept that could be further developed as
there are some interesting moral dilemmas thrown up, especially for Tremlett’s
character.
Written and Directed by Dan O'Brien with Dramaturgy by Jesse Daniels.
Yes/No - Curtin University (1 June 2014)
Curtin University regularly has two One Act plays presented
under the banner Sunday Night Theatre in the converted lecture room upstairs at
the Hayman Theatre.
The first of these tonight was a self-devised piece that
explored Fear. An unnamed woman (Rebecca Fowler) battles her demons and doubts
with a “raven” perched on her shoulder. She awakes to find Fight (Ariel
Tresham), Flight (Holly Dodd), Endure (Aaron Smith) and Undermine (Sean
Guastavino) fighting to be the dominant force in her life… or is it all just in
her head?
This is a high energy piece incorporating dance and stylised
fighting between the different impulses with the use of a bongo drum and vibrant
lighting giving the play a real kinetic feel. Fowler is literally torn between
these opposing forces as different scenarios are explored – the drunk on the
train who demands the shoes from a fellow passenger who meekly agrees in the
first instance (flight) but when the scene is reprised chooses to fight which
doesn’t end well for him either.
Fowler’s character at one stage has a lovely
‘courtship’ with Smith’s only to renege as they walk down the aisle. Characters
narrate from the sideline and in this case tell us the figures about domestic
violence against women, a prevalent fear unfortunately in this day and age. The
characters also interact with the audience asking them to name their own fears
before Fowler recites a list that includes rejection, loneliness and various
others.
I really liked the energy in this piece and especially the
ending where Fowler’s character states that her greatest fear is that she will
stop trying. In an age where there is seemingly so much to be fearful of this
was a poignant statement to end the play on.
The space is well used with the actors entering and exiting
from various points and yes, I didn’t even realise I sat next to the lead in
the front row before the play began! Talking to one of the actors afterwards
this took 7-8 weeks with two rehearsals a week to develop. I found it an
interesting exploration of what stops us growing and moving forward and maybe
how a lot of this is indeed in our head.
Directed by Savannah Wood with Dramaturgy by Amy Johnston.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















